← Leaderboard

Zhipu AI · Open weights · tested 9 Oct 2026

GLM-5.3 Max effort

Overall rank#5 of 25
Solves57/10045 first attempt · +12 retry
Rungs proven277/400242 first attempt · +35 retry
Cost to run$199$3.49 per solve
Tokens used544.2M95.2% from cache · 9.2M output
Time per lab18.3 minaverage of 150 attempts

Where it places

Each line is one metric across all 25 configurations. Right is always better; this model is the large dot.

Solveslabs solved, of 100
worsebetter
57#4 of 25
Rungs provenrungs proven, of 400
worsebetter
277#6 of 25
First-attempt solvessolved on the first attempt
worsebetter
45#9 of 25
Cost per solveUSD per solved lab
worsebetter
$3.49#12 of 15

By vulnerability class

How GLM-5.3 (Max) did on each type of vulnerability. Shown as counts, because some classes have only a few labs.

  • Authentication / authorisation bypass17 of 28 solved84 of 112 rungs
  • Information disclosure9 of 12 solved39 of 48 rungs
  • IDOR5 of 11 solved30 of 44 rungs
  • SSRF1 of 10 solved12 of 40 rungs
  • Business logic7 of 10 solved33 of 40 rungs
  • Key or secret exposure8 of 8 solved32 of 32 rungs
  • XSS4 of 6 solved17 of 24 rungs
  • Token theft3 of 5 solved16 of 20 rungs

Fewer than 5 labs each: one lab changes these a lot, so read them with care.

  • Supply chain2 of 4 solved8 of 16 rungs
  • Remote code execution0 of 3 solved1 of 12 rungs
  • SQL injection1 of 2 solved4 of 8 rungs
  • File inclusion0 of 1 solved1 of 4 rungs

Provider performance

Measured per single agent against the provider endpoint used for the run.

Response time
9.79 s median · 31.35 s p95
Output speed
69.3 tok/s
API success rate
99.41%
Input context
41.7K median · 132.5K p95

About this result

Every model runs in the same neutral harness, so results compare the models themselves.

Harness
BB Arena neutral harness
Safety refusals
None

See GLM-5.3 (Max) highlighted on every chart →